Face Threatening Acts in the First Presidential Debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on 26th September 2016: A Study of Pragmatics

Eva, Septiani (2018) Face Threatening Acts in the First Presidential Debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on 26th September 2016: A Study of Pragmatics. Other thesis, Universitas Darma Persada.

	Text Cover, etc..docx Download (1MB)
	Text Chapter I.docx Download (377kB)
	Text Chapter II.docx Download (384kB)
	Text Chapter III.docx Restricted to Registered users only Download (445kB)
	Text Chapter IV.docx Download (374kB)
	Text References.docx Download (380kB)
	Text Attachments.docx Download (1MB)

Abstract

Pragmatics is a branch of linguistics that studies the relationship between content and meaning. In the communication, we have to save people face and our face, because every participant in the social process has the need to be appreciated by others and the need to be free and not interfered with. This term paper discusses about politeness strategy and face threatening acts that are performed in the debate candidate’s utterances in the first presidential debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on 26th September 2016. This term paper also aims to find out what politeness strategy and FTAs that are the most frequently used and describe the purposes behind it. The fact that there are different contexts in every utterances, the writer assumes that those utterances have different politeness strategies and FTAs. For this reason, the theory of politeness strategies such as Bald-On-Record, Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness, Off-Record and FTAs such as Positive and Negative Face is conducted through qualitative approach. The research result shows that there are 139 total occurrences of politeness strategies and 139 total occurrences of FTAs either positive or negative face that used by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. FTAs that the most frequently used by Trump and Clinton is Negative Face with 72 total occurrences by Trump and 48 total occurrences by Clinton. Keywords: negative face, positive face, negative politeness Pragmatik adalah cabang ilmu linguistik yang mempelajari hubungan antara konteks dan makna. Setiap peserta didalam proses social memiliki kebutuhan untuk dihargai oleh orang lain dan kebutuhan untuk bebas dan tidak terganggu. Skripsi ini mendiskusikan tentang strategi kesopanan dan tindakan mengancam muka yang ditemukan pada tuturan peserta debat dalam ‘First Presidential Debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on 26th September 2016’. Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk menemukan strategi kesopanan dan tindakan mengancam muka yang paling sering digunakan dan mengemukakan tujuan atas penggunaan strategi dan tindakan tersebut. Adanya perbedaan konteks pada setiap ujaran yang disampaikan, penulis berasumsi bahwa ujaran tersebut menggunakan strategi dan tindakan mengancam muka yang berbeda. Oleh karena itu, teori mengenai strategi kesopanan seperti strategi langsung tanpa basa-basi, kesopanan positif, kesopanan negative, dan strategi tidak langsung serta tindakan mengancam muka seperti muka positif dan muka negative digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa total keempat strategi yang digunakan Donald Trump dan Hillary Clinton terjadi sebanyak 139 kali dan tindakan mengancam muka baik muka negatif atau positif yang digunakan oleh Donald Trump dan Hillary Clinton terjadi sebanyak 139 kali. Tindakan mengancam muka yang sering digunakan oleh Trump dan Clinton adalah wajah negatif dengan total 72 kali dan 48 kali. Kata Kunci: wajah negatif, wajah positif, kesopanan negatif

Item Type:	Thesis (Other)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	negative face, positive face, negative politeness
Subjects:	400 Language/Bahasa
Divisions:	Fakultas Bahasa Dan Budaya > Bahasa dan Kebudayaan Inggris
Depositing User:	Fachry Al-Tolah Perpustakaan
Date Deposited:	03 Dec 2018 09:38
Last Modified:	03 Dec 2018 09:39
URI:	http://repository.unsada.ac.id/id/eprint/498

Actions (login required)

View Item